@chrisrutz.de

Netzfundstücke und so...

  • The Periodic Table Of SEO Ranking Factors

    • 3 Jun 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • SEO
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    Media_httpsearchengin_osgkj

    The Periodic Table Of SEO Ranking Factors is designed to illustrate the most important things that can help you gain traffic from search engines such as Google and Bing.

    There are four major groups of factors:

    • On The Page Ranking Factors
    • Off The Page Ranking Factors
    • Violations
    • Blocking

    Within each group are are subgroups, as further pages of this guide will explain. Each of those subgroups contain one or more individual SEO factors.

    Those two letter acronyms you see on the chart? That’s our play on the periodic table of elements, and its two letter representations of each element. The first letter of each “SEO element” comes from the subgroup that it’s in. The second letter stands for the individual factor.

    Factors Work In Combination

    No single SEO factor will guarantee search engine rankings. Having a great HTML title won’t help if a page has low quality content. Having many links won’t help if they are low quality links. But having several positive factors can increase the odds of success. As for negative factors, they obviously can worsen the odds.

    On The Page Factors

    On The Page search ranking factors are those that are entirely within the publisher’s own control. What type of content do you publish? Are you providing important HTML clues that help search engines with determining relevancy? How does your site architecture help or hinder search engines?

    Off The Page Factors

    Off The Page ranking factors are those that publishers cannot directly control. Search engines use these because they learned long ago publisher signals alone don’t help relevancy. Some publishers will try to make themselves seem more relevant than they are, for example.

    More important, with billions of web pages to sort through, looking only at on-the-page clues isn’t enough. More signals are needed to better estimate what are the best pages for any particular search.

    Violations

    Make no mistake. Search engines want people to perform SEO. They provide help directly about SEO techniques and encourage this, because good SEO can improve their listings.

    However, there are some techniques that they deem “spam” or “black hat,” acts that if you do could results in your pages getting a ranking penalty or worse, being banned from the search engines entirely.

    Blocking

    Blocking is a new class of ranking signal. This is where searchers themselves may decide they don’t like pages from a particular web site, even if those web sites don’t violate any traditional spam rules.

    Blocking has a big impact on what the individual who blocks sees, but it also has an impact on what every searcher sees.

    Weighting

    All the factors we show are weighted on a scale of one to three, as shown in the top right corner of each factor. Three is deemed most important, something that you either should especially pay attention to, because it has a bigger impact than other factors.

    That doesn’t mean that factors weighted only two or one aren’t important. They are, or they wouldn’t have made the chart. It’s just that they are off less importance in relatively speaking, in terms of everything on the chart.

    The weighting is also our opinion, based on what search engines have said, surveys done of SEO and our own experience in watching the space over time. They’re not perfect; not everyone will agree with them. But we think they’re a useful general guide.

    Violations and Blocking factors are also weighted in negative numbers, with negative three being the worst.

    via searchengineland.com

    • Tweet
  • SEO In Pictures

    • 15 Apr 2010
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • SEO
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    Media_httpwwwdatadial_ddwzh
    by datadial.net via socialmediagraphics.posterous.com

    • Tweet
  • Social Media Effect

    • 22 Feb 2010
    • 1 Response
    •  views
    • SEO Social Media
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    Media_httpinfographic_qraef
    via infographicworld.com

    • Tweet
  • Essential SEO Infographics

    • 22 Feb 2010
    • 1 Response
    •  views
    • SEO
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    #1 - Pie Chart of SEO Time Expenditure


    Media_httpwwwseomozor_hsfbr

    #2 - Hat Color vs. Value Scatterplot of SEO Tactics


    Media_httpwwwseomozor_cgcdf

    #3 - Flowchart of SEO-Friendliness


    Media_httpwwwseomozor_lsbsf

    #4 - Venn Diagram of Internet Marketing Professions


    Media_httpwwwseomozor_hhjiw
    via seomoz.org

     

    • Tweet
  • Periodensystem der Rankingfaktoren

    • 9 Feb 2010
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • SEO
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    via seo2feel.de

    • Tweet
  • The SEO Strategy

    • 12 Jan 2010
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • SEO
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    Media_httpwwwjustmean_gcgzc
    via justmeandmy.com (What does an SEO Strategy look like?)

    • Tweet
  • The History and Evolution of SEO

    • 8 Jan 2010
    • 1 Response
    •  views
    • SEO
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    Media_httpwwwgreenlig_cadjc
    Media_httpwwwgreenlig_isaic
    via blog.greenlightsearch.com and socialmediagraphics.posterous.com
    • Tweet
  • Google's New Personalized Search

    • 5 Dec 2009
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • SEO
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    via youtube.com

    • Tweet
  • Diagramme zu Crawling, Indexing und Ranking

    • 2 Dec 2009
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • SEO
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    A Sample Site Architecture

    Typical Site's Link Earning Potential by Content Section

    Spider Crawl Priority Paths Graphic

    Methods to Improve Crawling, Indexing & Ranking

    via seomoz.org (Diagrams for Solving Crawl Priority & Indexation Issues)

    • Tweet
  • About

    Lost in Social Media & Online Marketing
    about.me/chrisrutz

    137447 Views
  • Archive

    • 2012 (4)
      • February (1)
      • January (3)
    • 2011 (38)
      • December (2)
      • November (14)
      • October (7)
      • September (1)
      • July (2)
      • June (2)
      • February (4)
      • January (6)
    • 2010 (331)
      • December (9)
      • November (9)
      • October (4)
      • September (3)
      • August (22)
      • July (12)
      • June (2)
      • May (16)
      • April (32)
      • March (22)
      • February (53)
      • January (147)
    • 2009 (274)
      • December (166)
      • November (94)
      • October (9)
      • September (4)
      • August (1)

    Get Updates

    Subscribe via RSS
    TwitterFacebookDelicious